On 2013-02-12 21:30, Era Scarecrow wrote:
Seems I did misread what you had, however having it creating dozens of misc/anonymous types doesn't seem like a wise idea. The entire block as it was defined is more like a scope/code block rather than a struct declaration; Then is it a delegate instead? (without return type or input type possibly)
I don't know what you're talking about. Where did "delegate" come from? -- /Jacob Carlborg
