On Wednesday, 20 February 2013 at 13:42:48 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 01:00:00 -0500, deadalnix
<[email protected]> wrote:
As discussed previously, I really wonder hy a const and non
const version of a function can exists in a first place. What
problem does it solve that isn't better solved by inout ?
const(T) and T are different types. Saying you can overload on
types, unless they just vary by const is a special case that I
don't think is worth adding.
Explain me how the hell you overload on implicit parameter types ?
