On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 05:55:49 -0500, Sönke Ludwig
<[email protected]> wrote:
Am 22.02.2013 20:34, schrieb Steven Schveighoffer:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 13:17:06 -0500, Sönke Ludwig
<[email protected]> wrote:
Am 21.02.2013 18:17, schrieb Sönke Ludwig:
Oh sorry, the problem is that I generated the docs on Windows and the
two files differ just by the case of the first character - so one was
overwritten by the other. I'll regenerate them on Linux when I have
some
time.
Done.
Still doesn't look right. RedBlackTree is listed as a template, but no
methods or fields are listed.
BTW, I really like this format. I think once these issues are ironed
out, it should be moved to Phobos docs.
-Steve
Fixed.
Beautiful!
Now, I need to examine how you do this, 'cause I want to do it for my
project :)
I think it would be a good idea to put the new documentation into a kind
of half-official place next to the classical docs until they are deemed
error-free. That way the exposure would be higher, so that the remaining
bugs can be found faster.
Yes, I would prefer that.
One further thing I would like to see, even if it's optional, is to see
types and functions in the tree on the left.
I love that inherited members are documented! This is exactly what I have
been looking for for YEARS, and it looks so good/official!
One thing that will need to be addressed/considered before this is
accepted as the standard docs is any use of 3rd party tools to generate
the docs. I noticed you said you use libevent. Some purists may not like
that...
-Steve
