On Sunday, February 24, 2013 14:22:42 Walter Bright wrote: > On 2/24/2013 9:05 AM, Timon Gehr wrote: > > For the moment I'm just sticking with 2.060, because I have failed to > > reduce all the forward reference regressions introduced in 2.061. > > I've found dustmite to be pretty helpful reducing things down.
I really need to figure out how to use dustmite one of these days. The last time that I tried to use it, I couldn't get it to work, but it may have been because rather than trying to find where the code stopped compiling, I was trying to find when the error message changed (the bug being encountered changed rather than a bug simply being introduced). - Jonathan M Davis
