On Sunday, 24 February 2013 at 21:40:24 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 2/24/13, Vladimir Panteleev <[email protected]>
wrote:
a) they come with a very thorough unit test
Unfortunately those unittests are never being run in the Phobos
test-suite and as a result a regression was missed (which was
fixed by
now):
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9309
The report for the unittests:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9310
Hmm, that's unfortunate. Some of that function's callees are
tested, but not the function itself.
The reason why unittest_burnin is not set in Phobos is that 1) it
requires a helper program to be compiled beforehand, and 2) it
runs indefinitely with random variations (hence its name).
I suppose a simpler additional unit test would be appropriate.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1161
