On Tuesday, 26 February 2013 at 16:45:08 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 11:09:48 -0500, Lars T. Kyllingstad
<[email protected]> wrote:
You'd use it like this:
spawnProcess(["prog"]);
That allocates. I don't like that requirement.
I know this is debatable and that we've discussed this before,
but I feel I should still mention that the cost of one more small
allocation will be absolutely negligible compared to the cost of
creating a new process, even taking into account long-term
effects of heap fragmentation and such. I don't think that API
design should suffer for such a small performance cost.
