Am Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:27:28 -0800 schrieb Walter Bright <[email protected]>:
> Two corporate users of D have also told me that their motivating case to > adopt D > was - compile speed! That's what I thought and why I keep telling that Carthago has to..., I mean that Phobos and the GC is not the ultimate performance platform. You just don't get fast + safe + convenient in one package, it's a compromise. > Throwing compile speed under the bus is what other compiler vendors do, and > we're not going to do that. I certainly hope so :D. It's just amazing that you barely notice a delay when compiling a medium sized program. DMD practically competes with interpreted languages here in terms of turn-around time. -- Marco
