On 3/2/2013 10:48 AM, Dicebot wrote:
As an embedded guy I dream of direct @safe opposite, somewhat similar to @nogc proposal but even more restrictive, one that could work with minimal run-time. I have tried to interest someone in experiments with D at work but lack of compiler verified subset that is embedded-ready was a big issue.
You can do that now. Use the badly named and rather undocumented "betterC" switch and you can build D apps that don't need phobos at all - they can be linked with the C runtime library only.
I use it to bring D up on a new target.
