On Saturday, March 09, 2013 04:38:08 Rikki Cattermole wrote: > Personally I think we need to consider D3 as breaking. We can > leave out any major changes till then or at least that would be > nice. That way we can use D2 for LTS once we begin on D3. > How ever this will bring back e.g. the old python 2.x vs 3.x > divide which would be a shame. But at the same time it'll mean we > can do some big stuff that would just not be acceptable in > breaking old projects.
D3 will not be happening any time soon. D2 will have to have been stable and around for a while before we plan to even consider it. - Jonathan M Davis
