Re: The new std.process is ready for review

[Lars T. Kyllingstad]

On Tuesday, 12 March 2013 at 15:07:09 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev 
wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 March 2013 at 15:02:46 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev 
wrote:
we could implement

(I use the word "we" very liberally in this thread)

Nah, implementing it is easy.  Getting the API right is the hard 
part.  So "we" is perfectly OK. :)

Lars