On 2013-02-16, 15:42, Jacob Carlborg wrote:

Well lucky you.

Please, relax. Trust me, we understand you feel miffed. Your attitude here
is hurting your case, and that's unnecessary.


I haven't even got a proper review for Orange. I got some comments and feedback but no formal review.

In December 2011[1] there was a push for review, where you basically said
it's not ready yet, referring to a September post[2] asking for a
pre-review. Is this all activity there has been? This happened during
christmas, which might explain a lack of responses.

I understand you want to be sure it'll be included before you do the work
that's necessary for it to be included, but there's a bit of chicken-and-
egg here.

And trust me, we want to see serialization in Phobos. You're close. Have
faith (and that comes from an atheist :p).


Saying something that I don't want to change anything is plain wrong. I got feedback that slices weren't properly deserialized and that it could be problems if the serializer was templated on the archive. That caused me to completely refactor the library, mostly internal.

I also got the suggestion to allow to set a serializer for a type both for a given instance of the serializer and globally. This also got implemented.

The only thing I haven't implemented that got suggested is support for versions. I haven't done that because I think that this doesn't need direct support because that can be handled by performing custom serialization of a type.

The only thing that could have caused problem is that it also supports D1/Tango. But I have said from day one that if it gets accepted I will remove any traces of D1 and Tango. Most of the code is completely independent of D1/Tango and the code which has dependencies is very local that has nothing to do with the actual design of the serializer.

So it's ready for a review now, not just a pre-review? Then tell us.
Get a review manager to read through it. Badger him to post it for review.
Yup, it's more work than sitting around hoping it will happen, but it has
a much higher chance of success.


[1]: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/[email protected]
[2]: http://forum.dlang.org/thread/[email protected]
--
Simen

Reply via email to