On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 08:46:42PM +0400, Dmitry Olshansky wrote: > 25-Mar-2013 20:43, Phil Lavoie пишет: > >I do believe that, in any case, this form is best: > >if( arr !is null && !arr.empty ) > > > > Now write that one thousand times and count the typos. [...]
What's wrong with just writing: if (arr.length > 0) ? .length will return 0 both when arr is null and when it's non-null but empty. T -- Heads I win, tails you lose.
