On Monday, 25 March 2013 at 18:15:21 UTC, TommiT wrote:
(++bar).fun();

... which would be lowered to:

(*cast(Bar*) ((cast(byte*) &++bar) + Bar.init._foo.offsetof)).fun();

Sorry, meant to say:

(*cast(Bar*) ((cast(byte*) &++bar) - Bar.init._foo.offsetof)).fun();

Reply via email to