On Monday, 25 March 2013 at 18:15:21 UTC, TommiT wrote:
(++bar).fun();... which would be lowered to:(*cast(Bar*) ((cast(byte*) &++bar) + Bar.init._foo.offsetof)).fun();
Sorry, meant to say:(*cast(Bar*) ((cast(byte*) &++bar) - Bar.init._foo.offsetof)).fun();
