Re: Dynamic arrays allocation size

[renoX]

On Tuesday, 26 March 2013 at 13:56:26 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
[cut]
Ahh, right. If you do
    auto data = new byte[3 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024L];

with the L suffix, then it works, of course. But this is crazy! 
:-)

Really, something needs to be rethought here, do you really 
want your constant folding to to overflow at 32 bits by 
default?. Is this because of CTFE?

Luís

I don't know why there is this behaviour but I fully agree with 
you that this is a bug.
It should at least trigger a warning..

renoX