"bearophile" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > bearophile: >> Having a return also helps to see templates as closer to compile-time >> functions (changing few things there may be ways to merge the syntax of >> templates with the syntax of compile time functions, reducing the >> complexity of D).< > > To write some templates as compile-time functions you may need to add a > new type to D, named "type": > > type foo(type T) { > return T[]; > } >
Yea, that's one thing I kind of miss from the VM languages like C#/Java. I been really wanting to see that in D.
