On 2013-04-05 07:37, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:

In light of this, here's a suggestion:  How about we, rather than
updating the old std.process, create a new module called
std.sys.process?  Or even better, IMO, std.sys.environment and
std.sys.pipe as well as std.sys.process?

I like that, to have a "sys" package.

--
/Jacob Carlborg

Reply via email to