"Andrei Alexandrescu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Lionello Lunesu wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
[snip]
Given the bad reputation that pointers have, I guess people wouldn't
like this all that much.
You don't need a pointer to T, you need a nullable T :)
...which doesn't exist...
You need a nullable reference to T...
Agreed. I just wanted to make a point (again) about nullable types. A
nullable reference would be great, as long as it works for all types,
builtins/classes/structs/... Without nullable references, SafeD will be a
p.i.t.a....
L.
