On 12 April 2013 18:21, Dicebot <[email protected]> wrote: > On Friday, 12 April 2013 at 08:14:25 UTC, Manu wrote: > >> ... >> > > While I generally agree with your point, std.process is hardly the place > to start from. It is not performance-critical functionality and it is not > basic functionality that may be used in other critical modules. It is > blaming consequences instead of reasons, not really practical. >
And I generally agree with your point. Like I said, I would have made this criticisms of whatever came alone ;)
