On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:15:33 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 4/12/13, Steven Schveighoffer <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:16:09 -0400, Kagamin <[email protected]> wrote:
On Friday, 12 April 2013 at 17:27:58 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
1. Add std.exp.module with the API as it will be WITHOUT warnings
exp.module?
Right.
I'd rather we keep it under "std" to avoiding stealing a name that an
external library might already use (it's not stealing per se but it
might introduce conflicts).
I'd like to take this opportunity to say I don't care what the name is :)
That wasn't any part of my suggestion. Whatever was decided as the "place
to put experimental modules" is what I meant.
-Steve
