Jason House: > Method 1 essentially calls in twice while method 2 calls in once.
Sometimes I just want to know if something isn't present. Having !in doesn't prevent me from writing and using x = y in aa; when I want it. > PS: Please don't assume that I'm advocating not having a !in operator. I'm > just pointing out possible reasons it may have been avoided.< I think that's not a possible reason :-) Bye, bearophile
