On Mon, 15 Apr 2013 21:26:04 +0200 "Vladimir Panteleev" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Monday, 15 April 2013 at 19:19:11 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Apr 2013 21:11:09 +0200 > > "Vladimir Panteleev" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Monday, 15 April 2013 at 18:05:18 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: > >> > and I frequently find it disk-bound even when I'm not doing > >> > anything. > >> > >> I've found that the "Remember content on visited pages" option > >> accounts for a lot of the disk usage. > > > > Isn't that just normal browser cache? Or there something > > different > > about it? > > It's the feature that controls indexing the cache, which allows > you to search through it in the address bar. The cache settings > are a bit lower on the same page.
Ah, I see. > > It's an interesting feature, one I haven't seen in other > browsers, too bad it's too resource-intensive. I remember that by > the time Opera added this, Firefox was only flaunting its new > "awesomebar", which Opera's been doing for a while. Actually, the "awfulbar" was one of the big things that turned me off of FF3. It's so...crayola. I know there's add-ins now to turn it off, but I got tired of having to bog it down with more and add-ins just to revert Mozilla's awesome new ideas.
