Re: DIP35: Really: Re: DIP36

[Robert]

Ooops, I meant I just read DIP36. Sorry for that, wrong thread.

On Wed, 2013-04-17 at 15:49 +0200, Robert wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I just read DIP35, sounds good as far as I can tell. What I missed, is
> overloading rules, what function would be chosen if you have overloads
> that take per value/auto ref/ref/scope ref/in ref for lvalues,
> rvalues, ...
> 
> Best regards,
> Robert
> 
>