On Saturday, 20 April 2013 at 14:42:57 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Yes, this temp ref issue is far more important than the ref
safety issue I've been concerning myself with. I wouldn't mind
if the objections I've brought up fall in favor of whatever it
takes to get temp ref solved. ref safety is important, but
it's nowhere near the shear *annoyingness* factor of rvalue
temp refs.
That is true, but it makes the impression that, with the
exception of Kenji, none of the core developers is interested
in a solution to this problem.
The DIP was not much discussed and the pull request is
regularly overlooked / ignored.
I don't think adding more to the language is the sane thing to do
right now.
