On Tuesday, 23 April 2013 at 07:50:44 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 22 April 2013 at 14:25:21 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Sunday, 21 April 2013 at 19:58:14 UTC, Tourist wrote:
What's holding you from releasing a version now and declaring
it stable for e.g. a year?
What would be the benefit of just declaring one release stable?
This is not a trick question.
David
I have raised this topic several times already. Stable version
that is guaranteed to never break user code but still receives
non-breaking bug-fixes is important for corporate adoption -
those will never agree to spend some tome in the middle of
running project to fix some unknown breakage created by a tool.
Okay, maybe it was somewhat of a trick question after all:
"Tourist" put it as if all that was required was to mark a
certain version stable, and I wanted to hint at the fact that
this alone wouldn't help anybody at all.
David
