29-Apr-2013 22:50, Jonathan M Davis пишет:
On Monday, April 29, 2013 22:13:09 Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Technically these should be in std.string and are there but incorrect.
Then fix them there.
I think it will take a certain amount of leaked implementation details
to get it done at least half-decently. In particular to re-use the same
case-folding table as for case-insensitive matching.
Would be a strategic mistake IMHO to spread the internals across 2 modules.
Then std.string could provide a public alias(es) as it imports std.uni
anyway?
Going further if we are to preserve the status quo then std.uni will
declare them as package to not advertise their new location.
- Jonathan M Davis
--
Dmitry Olshansky
