On 2013-05-12, 11:10, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
On 2013-05-12, 08:12, deadalnix wrote:
On Saturday, 11 May 2013 at 22:24:38 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
I'm not convinced. unique, like const or immutable, is transitive. If
foo
is unique, then so is foo.bar.
That isn't true. Please read microsoft's paper.
Done. *Mostly* transitive, then. Anything reachable through a unique
reference is either unique or immutable.
btw, we're free to define unique to be completely transitive, or even
not transitive at all. We need not end up with a carbon copy of
Microsoft's system.
--
Simen
