On Fri, 17 May 2013 03:01:35 +0200 "Borden" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thursday, 16 May 2013 at 21:36:03 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh wrote: > > Can you provide a reference for the claim that the next > > incarnation of TeX is going to be XML based? I did a quick > > search and > > couldn't turn up anything. Perhaps it was some sort of April > > fool's joke > > :o) > > You're right. I fell for it. I think I was referring to his > announcement of iTeX, which any idiot should have noticed was a > joke. I'm no idiot, I'm apparently far more gullible :-P I think it's quite easy to believe joke claims of adopting XML, considering how much XML already gets used where it doesn't belong. This one's my favorite (a joke, obviously): http://www.charlespetzold.com/etc/CSAML.html
