On 05/22/2013 04:40 PM, Dicebot wrote: > On Wednesday, 22 May 2013 at 21:38:49 UTC, 1100110 wrote: >> ... > > I simply don't understand why do you find libclang unsuitable. >
hmmm? I never said it was unsuitable, I think you mistaking me for someone else. (I also have no experience with libclang, and I'm tired of manually translating these things... So, am I looking for a way to not translate this? Yes.) Also I'm pretty sure I'd need help with something like this...
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
