On Wed, 22 May 2013 14:26:53 -0400, Jonathan M Davis <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 14:34:37 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Tue, 21 May 2013 19:02:19 +0200
Jacob Carlborg <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2013-05-21 03:52, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> > Y'know what we need? This compiler flag:
> > -unittest=pagkage.name.*
>
> That exact syntax will probably cause some problems with the shell.
Ugh, yea, that's right. I love the unix shell, but I'm convinced that
having the shell expand globs was a colossal mistake.
Quotes are your friend.
-unittest="package.name.*"
ahem...
-unittest='package.name.*'
:)
And TBH, you would have to have a file named literally
"-unittest=package.name.xyz" for that to actually be expanded by the
shell. I don't think it really would be an issue.
-Steve
