On Wednesday, 22 May 2013 at 17:06:59 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
it's only module level granularity.
I agree that a library solution is the way to go, however there
needs to be
a way to have finer granularity, ie being able to call
individual unittests.
I gave the reasons in the 2nd post in this thread. Syntax would
be:
unittest(test_fun){...}
having a short syntax such as this will make people use it.
digressing, I wish there would be a simple non-anonymous way to
vote for
such features, to see whether most people agree/disagree. It's
easier than
voting by email, which invariably gets lost in digressions (as
I'm doing
here).
For a real life project you probably need a unittest framework.
Current approach is for an optimistic case when you mostly have
green test runs and just unittests are enough to test the whole
system.
