As those of you who do write some non-toy projects in D know, from time to time you projects become unbuildable because of Issue 9044 [1] an you have to juggle with files and randomly copy/move functions from one library to another to "detrigger" the issue creating mess marked "Issue 9044 workaround". It become really annoying when your one-file project using an external library fails as it forcing you to juggle with that library files (e.g. VisualD's `cpp2d` project which triggers the issue randomly).

I'd never complain about such things but the language is tend to be self-called stable by main maintainers and I'd like to finally see an official definition of this "stability" as it obviously contradicts my personal very loyal definition (e.g. I have noting against breaking changes if they are in good direction).


[1] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9044

--
Денис В. Шеломовский
Denis V. Shelomovskij

Reply via email to