On 5/25/13 8:56 PM, Borden wrote:
My contention is that, for the purposes of writing lengthy, non-code
documentation like the DLang spec (I'm not referring to any other
documentation or pages on the site), enclosing the entire exposition in
macros has made the source too inflexible for me to work with without
awkward workarounds or having to write my own parser. Again, the idea is
to use the features of HTML5 and compile the DLang spec into an ePub
document that I can read on my brand-new Kobo.

This is a worthy goal. We manage to generate mobi files for the spec (and Phobos in a pull request), is the ebook format very different?

Andrei

Reply via email to