On 5/26/2013 7:26 AM, Peter Alexander wrote:
A language that statically enforces the programmer to check for null would help here.
I'm not arguing it won't help. I've been working in the background on a NotNull!T template.
I'm arguing that the benefits are being oversold. It's like saying null pointers are the vast bulk of programming bugs. I just find that to be so obviously untrue.
Making non-nullable pointers is just plugging one hole in a cheese grater.
