On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 06:11:20 UTC, Joakim wrote:
You claimed that my encoding was reinventing the wheel, therefore the onus is on you to show which of the multiple encodings CDRA uses that I'm reinventing. I'm not interested in delving into the docs for some dead IBM format to prove _your_ point.
It's your idea and project. Showing that it is original / doing your research on previous efforts is probably something that *you* should do, whether or not it's someone else's "point".
More likely, you are just dead wrong and CDRA simply uses code pages
Based on what?
