On Thursday, May 30, 2013 22:39:40 MrzlganeE wrote: > > And I don't think that this does by a long shot. auto already > > provides us with > > this functionality. It's just that the syntax for auto doesn't > > I understand what you guys are saying, I agree that not > everything should be added. But come on, > > On a *FEW* things you can support 2 styles. > > If you support a few styles on a *few* things, it does not mean > you have to support everything on all things. > > D has features for functional programmers, and byte-level > programmers too!
There is a significant difference between a language feature which adds actual functionality and one that's purely syntactic sugar. - Jonathan M Davis
