On Friday, 31 May 2013 at 03:07:22 UTC, nazriel wrote:
That actually looks good...
I liked idea of:
auto (x, y) = foo();
(int x1, string y1) = foo();
(int, string) foo() {
(int tmp, string tmp2) = (3, "dsa");
return (42, "dsa");
}
but it was shoot down because of various issues.
This have an issue with one element tuple. Not unsolvable, but
must be considered.
Then proposal with {} risen:
auto {x, y} = foo();
{int x1, string y1} = foo();
{int, string} foo() {
{int tmp, string tmp2} = {3, "dsa"};
return {42, "dsa"};
}
This is a reciepe for disaster. {} are already used way too much,
sometime on way that are hard to deambiguate.
Now this:
auto #(x, y) = foo();
#(int x1, string y1) = foo();
#(int, string) foo() {
#(int tmp, string tmp2) = #(3, "dsa");
return #(42, "dsa");
}
This have the advantage of not having issue with one element
tuples.
My 2 cents :))
bearophile what do you think?
I also do agree that the 3rd one is probably the best.
