On 1 June 2013 12:02, bearophile <[email protected]> wrote: > Manu: > > > Building DMD with MSVC results in a compiler that runs MUCH MUCH faster. >> In the interest of making DMD releases as fast as possible, this should be >> standardised. >> > > How much faster? > And how much time does it take to compile DMD itself? I compile DMD almost > every day, so I am interested in keeping this time quite low. > > (On Windows I use G++ v.4.8, isn't it good enough to compile DMD, instead > of MSVC?) >
Are the releases not built with DMC? Last time I tried to build DMD, it was configured to use DMC by default. I'm sure GCC would also be fine.
