Alex Rønne Petersen:
final switch (insn.op)
{
case imm: lbl = &&handle_imm; break;
case add: lbl = &&handle_add; break;
case sub: lbl = &&handle_sub; break;
// ...
case ret: lbl = &&handle_ret; break;
Regarding the syntax, why do you use "&&"? Isn't a single "&" enough?
case imm: lbl = &handle_imm; break;
If such gotos become a natural part of the D syntax then it's not
necessary to copy the GNU C syntax.
Bye, bearophile
