On 4 June 2013 22:47, Andrei Alexandrescu <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 6/4/13 4:36 AM, Manu wrote: > [snip] > > I've read this, thanks for answering. Unfortunately I need to retire from > this thread - there's only so many hours in the day, and it seems we got to > the point where all sides shout the same malarkey over and over again past > one another. > > It would be great if this thread results in a language improvement - a > means to negate a storage class label inside a class. I think that's required anyway, separately to this discussion.
