On 2013-06-05 09:11, Joshua Niehus wrote:
personally, I prefer the current implementation and found it easy to use for the multitudes of tiny scripts I've written. I wouldn't like to create an "object" just to call isAbsolute.
I agree. But if you're passing around a lot of paths it would probably be a good idea to have a proper type for the paths.
That being said, I don't see why having the struct would hurt.
-- /Jacob Carlborg
