On Thursday, 6 June 2013 at 01:00:36 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
This was circa 2003. Look at the state of Java from then. And
also consider that when the *decision* was made to make
non-virtual the default, was considerably before then.
-Steve
This is why I wrote that this may have been true in the past.
Nevertheless, it is completely false today.
History also showed us that C# introduced way to revirtualize
method, for several purposes like mock. We can't simple take this
argument and don't look at it with the light of history.
The history shows that out of 3 point, only one remains valid,
and this is the one about properties. Ironically, this is the one
that do not apply to D (in its current shape) as we don't have an
proper property.
- Re: Slow performance compared to C++, ideas? Steven Schveighoffer
- Re: Slow performance compared to C++, ideas? Simen Kjaeraas
- Re: Slow performance compared to C++, ideas? deadalnix
- Re: Slow performance compared to C++, ideas? Max Samukha
- Re: Slow performance compared to C++, ideas? Paulo Pinto
- Re: Slow performance compared to C++, ideas? bearophile
- Re: Slow performance compared to C++, ideas? Manu
- Re: Slow performance compared to C++, ideas? Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: Slow performance compared to C++, ideas? deadalnix
- Re: Slow performance compared to C++, ideas? Steven Schveighoffer
- Re: Slow performance compared to C++, ideas? deadalnix
- Re: Slow performance compared to C++, ideas? Paulo Pinto
- Re: Slow performance compared to C++, ideas? deadalnix
- Re: Slow performance compared to C++, ideas? Kapps
- Re: Slow performance compared to C++, ideas? Kapps
- Re: Slow performance compared to C++, ideas? deadalnix
- Re: Slow performance compared to C++, ideas? Steven Schveighoffer
- Re: Slow performance compared to C++, ideas? deadalnix
- Re: Slow performance compared to C++, ideas? Walter Bright
- Re: Slow performance compared to C++, ideas? Walter Bright
- Re: Slow performance compared to C++, ideas? deadalnix