On 6/6/2013 11:09 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
We've already discussed this at length. It's possible that we missed
something, but this proposal is not something that we just jumped into without
thinking it through first. In fact, it actually took quite a bit to talk Walter
into the necessity of it in the first place.

The only reason I'm for it is because we need to break up std.algorithm (for the canonical example) without breaking existing code.

I'm sure the problem with:

simple module => kitchen sink monstrosity => break up module

is a recurring issue that most everyone has sooner or later. We need to support 
it.

Reply via email to