On Friday, 7 June 2013 at 08:21:32 UTC, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
On Friday, 7 June 2013 at 07:57:07 UTC, nazriel wrote:
Again, I am not forcing anything on you or Steven.
I am asking you for opinion on something I find useful because
you are the experts and I really like your work on new
std.process
It's not up to us either. If the community wants it, and it
can be implemented in a seamless manner, it should be.
By the way, did you look at Dennis Luehring's suggestion?
http://linux.die.net/man/3/pthread_atfork
This looks like just what you need and more, it is part of the
POSIX standard, and as far as I can see it can be used together
with std.process. You just call pthread_atfork() before you
call spawnProcess().
Yeah, now I noticed Dennis response.
It may be the solution to my issue yes.
Lovely POSIX, you can always count on it *G*
Thanks Dennis, Lars for help.
Sorry for the noise I caused.
