On 06/10/2013 12:56 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, June 09, 2013 16:36:45 Timon Gehr wrote:
On 06/09/2013 04:31 PM, Diggory wrote:
Yeah, as long as it still prefers to match "const" during overload
resolution then it's always possible to provide a const version when
needed:
void foo(T)(T x) {}
void foo(T)(const T x) {}
const int a = 1;
foo(a);
Clearly T should match "int" rather than "const(int)", and then the
second overload called.
Then clearly DMD is buggy.
It's clearly as in that's the way that he thinks that it should clearly work,
not as in that's how it's actually supposed to work. ...
Yes, that's clear.
