On 06/09/2013 11:09 AM, deadalnix wrote:
> On Sunday, 9 June 2013 at 10:22:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> I'd argue that it would make code harder to read, because it hides where
>> the variables are coming from.
+1. A friend of mine is "still experimenting" with 'with' and I hate
reading his code. :)
with (new C()) {
i = 42; // is that a member of C?
j = 43; // how about that?
foo(); // and that?
bar(); // and that?
}
Thanks for obfuscating! :)
> switch(foobar) with(FoobarEnum) {
> // ...
> }
>
> That is golden !
+1000 :o)
To me, 'with' is useful only in that case.
Ali
