On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 01:06:07 Jesse Phillips wrote: > On Monday, 10 June 2013 at 21:40:58 UTC, Jonas Drewsen wrote: > > A quick first look for now: > > > > In general I think that you should clone phobos and merge > > orange into std.serialize in order for us to see how it really > > fits into phobos. > > > > As such I think it feels more like a RFC than formal review > > because it couldn't possible go into phobos in its current > > state even if we ignored all comments from the this list. > > While this is true and it would be my responsibility to help fit > Orange into Phobos, there is no clear answer and is something > community needs to give input into. > > This project has already been through RFC and was not provided > input during the "Ready for Review" announcement. So I have taken > my self appointed position to push this into the formal platform > were people will be required to voice failures they see for > inclusion into Phobos. > > Thank you for continuing the feedback, I will consider this > particular state when deciding to call for a vote, remember that > you can vote No and explain the hold up, if the state at voting > is not something you feel can/should be included.
I thought that it was clear that anything being submitted for review for inclusion in Phobos actually had to be in a state where a pull request for Phobos could be created for it. We certainly can't possibly vote it in if it's not in such a state, because we wouldn't even know what it would look like when it was merged in. - Jonathan M Davis
