On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 05:58:50 -0400, Jacob Carlborg <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2013-06-11 11:07, Jonas Drewsen wrote:
Jacob: Would it be doable to refactor the attribute magic in
std.serialization into a separate module that could be provided as 3rd
party extension to std.serialization until phobos itself is ready for
attributes?
The generic code for attributes is located in orange.core.Attribute,
this can be inlined or removed. The actual attributes them self are
located in orange.serialization.Serializable.
The library is perfectly usable without UDA's. The old template mixins
are still available.
If __traits(getAttributes) is not allowed in Phobos then I have to
remove the code that checks for UDA's.
I think we can have and use UDAs in Phobos without yet having to create a
guideline. Note that there is lots of experience with attributes in other
languages that we can draw from. Most people here have written in at
least one other language that uses them.
I have no problem with std.serialization using attributes, even if there
is no "official" guide.
-Steve
