On Tuesday, 18 June 2013 at 08:10:24 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
Inlining should remove performance penalty. Nobody holds the
immediately
called lambda, so it should be treated as a 'scope delegate'.
For that, we
would need to add a section in language spec to support it.
Alright.
I did some benching, and they aren't getting inline (well... I
don't *think* they are): Code with an inline lambda call is
definitely slower (in my case, with no args passed).
My tests are somewhat synthetic, (I'm testing a rather short
function with a lambda) but the overall slowdown is quite
noticeable. I don't worry about it much, but I guess these could
scale in the grand scheme of things, and is a bit vexing when all
you wanted to was mark something as trusted :/
Shouldn't an inlined lambda call *always* be... inlined? I really
don't see a reason not to do so, but I'm outside my field of
competence at that point.
