Daniel Keep Wrote:
>
>
> Steve Teale wrote:
> > If I write:
> >
> > static if (cond1)
> > {
> > ...
> > }
> > else static if (cond2)
> > {
> > ...
> > }
> > else
> > {
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > is the block after the final else 'static'? Would it be better if the
> > 'static' before the whole sequence of tests applied throughout rather than
> > having to be explicitly restated in some places, but not in others?
> >
> > Steve
>
> I don't think so. The problem is that there's no such thing as "chained
> ifs" in the language. What you're actually looking at is this:
>
> static if (cond1)
> {
> ...
> }
> else
> {
> static if (cond2)
> {
> ...
> }
> else
> {
> ...
> }
> }
>
> Once you realise that there's nothing special about either "else if" or
> "else static if", it makes perfect sense.
Daniel,
So I have to write
static if (cond1)
{
}
else static if (cond2)
{
}
else static if (true)
{
// for the default alternative?
}
Looks a bit strange
Steve
