Sjoerd van Leent wrote:
On top of that, D is at version 2,
D2 is in alpha, D1 is "stable".
whereas Tango is at version 1 of D.
Tango uses D1 because D1 is stable. There is a Tango 2 branch, I believe
it is incomplete currently.
I'm still in doubt whether Phobos would be better than Tango.
That depends on your needs. I personally prefer tango due to its speed
and greater feature set. It's also actively maintained, phobos 1 only
gets bug fixes now. If you decide to use D2 then phobos is probably the
best (only?) option currently, it seems to be shaping up nicely.
If so, miniD would be ruled out.
MiniD is an excellent language, I'd definitely recommend it if you
decide on D1/Tango.
If that would be the case, there needs to be a proper binding between D and
Ruby.
I don't believe any exist currently, you'd probably have to write your own.
You seem to require a lot of libraries for what you want, in which case
D1 is probably best as there's a nice selection of libraries available
for it. Sorry I couldn't help with any of your other issues.
